Orson Wells is pretty good at magic. This is probably the first thing that came to mind and the only thing that truly stuck in my head while watching this movie. It was the only thing I could really follow as this movie comes close to Schizopolis levels of confusing. It’s like a mix of a documentary while being a regular movie at the same time. Personally, I did think that this concept was interesting but not interesting enough to stay awake.
The movie opens with a magic trick which kicked my interest as magic is a small hobby of mine. It then proceeds to explain how everything we are going to see on screen is non-fictitious; explaining to the audience how everything is based on a true story but is done in a different way. We are then presented a series of interviews, clips, and explanations, all narrated by Orson Wells himself. The movie follows and explores the concept of “fakeness” through duplication paintings in the art world. We get many interviews of and about the great Elmyr; a painter famous for replicating the works of other famous artists. The audience is shown different interviews about replication in the art world, asking us the question “is fake art still art?” All this is told through clever editing of real-life clips and interviews to give the audience a feeling like they’re watching a regular movie as opposed to an elaborate documentary. It was very unique and interesting however I couldn’t help but be bored out of my mind.
Perhaps it was a mix of the confusing editing and Orson Wells’ voice that made this happen but I found the movie incredibly difficult to watch. I believe it was because it was edited to look and feel like a fictitious film but it had the content and details of a documentary. It was probably my own personal short attention span that made following what little of a plot I could perceive very hard to follow. I prefer watching stories that make me want to know what’s going to happen next, in this movie I was presented a lot of opinions and anecdotes about stuff I don’t really know or care about. While I do find the concept of a documentary story being told as a work of fiction, it was the subject matter that I really found boring. I am not the biggest fan of paintings, while I do appreciate their beauty and meaning, I’m not exactly the biggest fan of canvas art. Watching an almost two hour movie about fake paintings was nearly the death of me. This on top of Orson Wells’ incredibly soothing and deep voice made me miss a big part of the movie’s story. The tangent of Picasso’s life on the island is a really big blur in my memory and I can barely remember any of it aside from the way Well’s pronounced Oja’s name.
While I do enjoy the concept of the film Orson Wells’ lovingly put together, I can’t say it’s exactly something I would watch or recommend. I do acknowledge that this is largely a personal issues as a lot of what the film’s story was based around is of little interest to me. At the end of the movie, the only thing I was really thinking about was how Wells managed to pull of that coin trick wearing thick gloves; there’s no dexterity available while wearing those things.