Written by Moosh Reyes | 161690
Watching F For Fake as the last movie for this class was definitely one that was worth the wait. I am a big fan of magic and the art of misdirection, especially in movies! The biggest movie I’ve watched that really mastered the art of misdirection before F for Fake would have been Now You See Me. F For Fake, however, totally changed my perspective as compared to the usual movies about magic that tries to mystify and shock its audiences.
F for Fake is a movie that isn’t a movie and a documentary that isn’t a documentary. Orson Welles is somehow able to piece together a work of art through the magical editing that he and his team pull off. The editing is then accompanied with Orson Welles’ story telling abilities which he shows as the narrator. F for Fake started out as a documentary film for the art forger, Elmyr de Hory and some of the shots in the film show it. Most of these shots (of course) focus on Elmyr de Hory talking with the people in Ibiza and looking at paintings he had made. My favorite part of this film would most probably be the fact that I thought this was a genuine movie that had fictional characters. That’s how well I found editing and how well Orson Welles was able to fit pieces together.
Moving on to characters, I believe that each character truly portrayed a remarkable aspect of the theme of fakeness. Orson Welles is the first person who perpetuates this fakeness by guiding the audience through the movie and establishing himself as a trustworthy source for the whole movie. This is true for most of the movie until the last 15-20 minutes when he and Oja Kodar give a fake story about Picasso and de Hory feuding over paintings that Picasso painted for Oja. Oja presents the role of one who knows the truth and yet continues to help Orson with misdirecting the audience with what is truth and what is fake. Next, we have Elmyr de Hory. His character is more diverse in the sense that he believed that his art works were real. They were, after all, made by him. The problem with his work was that it looked similar to other artist’s and was therefore accused as fake. Lastly, there is Clifford Irving. His character is the
one that outs the fakers and continues to be a faker himself. His character is one that, in my opinion, seems to be the most hypocritical out of all the four major characters. With the first three, they are aware of what is real for them and what is fake. These characters are able to work along these lines and distinguish what is right and what is wrong. Irving, on the other hand, continues to call others out on their fakery while he tries to make profits with his own.
F for Fake is a work of art in its own way as are Elmyr de Hory’s art works. It isn’t necessarily trying to copy other movies but it is trying to take what is familiar to most and making it unfamiliar to them. This is the wonderful magic that Orson Welles is able to do with his film. I have yet to see another film like this one.

